Mentally Ill Until Proven Innocent? A Frequent Issue in Custody Cases

Joshua Katz - Mentally Ill Until Proven Innocent? A Frequent Issue in Custody Cases{3:00 minutes to read} Allegations of mental illness, noncompliance with psychiatric medication, psychological treatment or therapy are frequent concerns among feuding parents in custody cases. A clearly relevant issue, the court will often need more information about the parties and their mental status.

However, HIPAA laws and the concern over privacy makes obtaining mental health records and entering them into evidence very challenging.

Obtaining Medical Records

When mental health is made an issue in a custody case, a subpoena should be issued to the service provider(s).

Most often, the mentally ill spouse will not want confidential information entered into evidence and will refuse to sign consent or a HIPAA release form allowing the provider to share records.

As a result, a motion must be made to the court. The court will then determine whether the importance of the records to the best interests of the child(ren) outweighs the privacy concerns of the protected party. If so, the court will issue an order stating “pursuant to NY MHL §33.12(c)(1), the interests of justice significantly outweigh the need for the patient’s confidentiality.”  

When this order is issued by the court, the mental health provider is no longer violating privacy laws by releasing records to the courteven if their patient instructs them not to release the records.

Despite this, many providers are still reluctant to share records. Although HIPAA violations are no longer an issue, there remains a valid concern about the ongoing status of the clinician-patient relationship if records are divulged against the patient’s will. With this in mind, providers often do not release records.

This leaves the litigant, and the Court, with no evidence and no viable way of obtaining records to prove the mental health status of the other parent. Unfortunately, this is quite common. At this point, however, the judge can take a negative inference from the failure of the accused mentally ill parent to provide records.

In other words, the judge can assume the allegation of mental illness is true despite the lack of evidence.

Mental Illness & Custody Cases

Mental illness is really no different from other types of illness. With treatment and medication compliance, there is often little effect on parenting ability, judgment, or reasoning. A person with mental illness may be perfectly capable of handling their child and, with the proper care, asymptomatic.

Still, for many, there is a stigma attached to mental illness (although it’s been said that half of America is on Prozac, and the other half should be!).

Doctors do not like to talk about their patients, nor do mentally ill people want to discuss their problems. Frequently, a mentally ill person is not cognizant of how their illness affects their ability to make decisions or parent effectively. When a person does not accept their level of illness, it is even more difficult to obtain records from doctors and prove in court.

The Take-Away

HIPAA makes obtaining records as evidence increasingly complicated.

For the practitioner, HIPAA violations are avoidable when the court determines that the importance of the records outweighs privacy concerns. Still, the doctor is not a party to the action and cannot be ordered to produce records—the right to do so is discretionary.

In lieu of proof, a negative inference can be made, and the allegation of mental illness might be assumed to be true. Contact us to discuss this in more detail or if you have any questions about how allegations of mental illness affect custody cases.

Plaine & Katz, LLP
80-02 Kew Gardens Rd.
Suite # 1050
Kew Gardens, NY 11415

Pets Are People, Too!

Pets Are People, Too! by Joshua Katz

{4:30 minutes to read} “Decidedly more than a piece of property”—pet owners would categorically agree that their pets are indeed family.

In a recent decision in the case of Travis v. Murray, Judge Matthew Cooper of Manhattan said that Joey, a mini Dachshund, was “decidedly more than a piece of property,” allowing for a brief best interest hearing to determine custody of the family dog post-divorce.

The hearing determines which “parent” will provide a better home environment for the dog and be more apt to allow the other “parent” the ability to foster a continued relationship with Joey. 

Continue reading Pets Are People, Too!

New York’s Recent Changes to Family Laws: What You Need to Know

New York’s Recent Changes to Family Laws: What You Need to Know by Joshua Katz

{4:20 minutes to read} Recently, New York has made fast-paced changes that affect family law practitioners. Attorneys and divorce professionals must take these important modifications into account. 

The Child Support Cap and Its Ramifications 

Continue reading New York’s Recent Changes to Family Laws: What You Need to Know

Manhattan-Quality Divorce Representation at a Queens Price

Manhattan-Quality Divorce Representation at a Queens Price By Joshua Katz

{1:15 minutes to read} Parents going through divorce want the best for their children, but sometimes they disagree on what “the best” actually is.

Child custody disputes are often the most contentious obstacles for divorcing parents to overcome. While there are many matrimonial law practitioners to choose from in New York, Plaine & Katz, LLP stands out from the crowd because of our experience and expertise in custody disputes and equitable distribution litigation, in addition to the following aspects of divorce:

Continue reading Manhattan-Quality Divorce Representation at a Queens Price